DILDAR HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD AFZAAL ALIAS CHALA
Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) against an eyewitness's relationship with the complaining party was not sufficient to refute his testimony unless the accused could be accused. That it has an interim purpose of making false accusations of the accused. During the cross-examination of the commission of the crime in relation to its relationship with the complaining party, no question was raised on the eyewitness, nor has it been proved that on the basis of such a relationship he had committed the crime. The witness was exonerated with the opposite motive The witness had fully supported the prosecution's case against the current accused, and on the basis of his isolation, no reliable evidence was produced against the accused nor was the defendant guilty of the amount. The accused's guilt or innocence was always resolved in the cases; the High Court did not consider this statement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Besham lawyer
