Find a Lawyer

TANVIR ASHRAF versus CH. RIASAT ALI

Article 99 (1) (CC) Conan Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 92 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitutional Application National Assembly Election Applicants Respondents Papers Nomination approval The plea of the plea was that the appellant was not BA as his result card was forged, so the High Court accepted the constitutional application after finding the fake result card on the basis of the university's comment and checking the original record. What. And that no degree was issued in favor of the Appellant Validity Award list and the notification of the examinations containing the appellant's name and roll number, which shows that he had passed the BA examination, is on the original record. Is. The possibility of regularity on the same roll number was attached to such documents requiring very strong or at least solid reliable material to denounce such documents, in the absence of concrete evidence, the university's position that The award list and notification was fake, not durable. The loss of the appellant created by the University cannot be suppressed, the list of awards was not heard and the notification signed by the Controller of Examinations will be equal to its approval. It has been more than a year. For such a delay, it can neither be charged nor a negative conclusion can be drawn that it is the University's responsibility to issue a degree, which recognizes the recognized result card as an alternative. The result of the degree was based on a card notification, University us immigration advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer