CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF, PUNJAB, LAHORE- versus NIZAMUL HAQ
The notification regarding sections 7 and 11 under section 7 of the Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance, 1979, which was supposed to be owned by a private property in a notification, was discovered on the basis of a decision of the Civil Court passed on 13 19 834. This is because his name was resolved by the Civil Court in the year 1934 in the Jamabandi of 1988, in the year 1934, there was no credible evidence presented by the appellant so that the private nature of the property in dispute. Defendant's claim about the case may be defamed. In the presence of a civil court verdict and injunction on this matter, there was no point in mentioning me in the affidavit; there was no error or unlawful action by the trial court to rely on such evidence and record the results. According to the High Court, the intervention was refused. Appeal dismissed, dismissed in these circumstances after the court ruled below
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Leepa lawyer
