Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus SH. MUHAMMAD AKRAM SHANGI

R20 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 18 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court had appealed that drug applications be lifted from new applications, license of applicants from non-issuance of powers. Declined. 2) The Punjab Drug Rules 1988, because they were not pharmacists, the High Court passed the order by the authorities that the provisions of R20 (2) of the Punjab Drug Rules 1988 were declared. In this case Article 18 of the Constitution has been demanded as ulterior motive as raised by the authorities by PLD 1992 LA 415 that till then legitimate provisions were provided for Punjab Drug Rules, 1988. Under the drug rules, 1945 and 1958 must be followed that the justification taken by the authorities was not raised in front of a single bench of the High Court immigration advocates phone number from Naudero lawyer