Find a Lawyer

SHOUKAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 10 (2) / 16 Penal Code (XIV of 1860), section 468/471 against the female accused alleged that she had committed illicit relations with the abductor and her abductor during her marriage. The woman accused of the accused had alleged that her previous husband had divorced her and had legally married the partner after the divorce. The accused had also submitted a copy of the divorce and The bridegroom then presented proof of marriage to the co-accused. The accused's ex-husband was divorced and the woman accused of having married a partner during the marriage, the second marriage of the accused woman was void and both the accused were living in adultery and were guilty of adultery commissions. The ex-husband had a thumbs up and his national identification card number was also registered. Apart from the ex-husband of the accused, he was also seen by three people who either kept their signature or had a thumbs up, Neither said that the individuals were examined as witnesses nor are there any records that show that their signatures Thugs or thumb marks were not proven by the Bogus Prosecution that the thumb impression of the accused's ex-husband was fake and said that the prosecution's failure could not be cured merely by mistake, but it is as if it had been done intentionally, by the prosecution. In favor of the accused and the accused. That the divorce had given the impression of a thumb on the accused's ex-husband, and likewise, the divorce from the previous husband's accused was permissible, in the circumstances, it could be truly accepted, both the accused concerned about the registration of the marriage. top civil advocates from Khangarh lawyer