Find a Lawyer

SHABBIR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Article 395, 324 and 353 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 555 before the High Court before the High Court case, the merits of the appeals were neither one of the exercise of jurisdiction. Only heirs in the jurisdiction. In the sense of section 561A, the CCP appeals came to the conclusion that the accused was convicted for a crime under section 395, the PPC was declared a felony and sentenced to five years imprisonment. The conviction was given by the \ RI Trial Court, who observed that he could not sentence the accused. d Haramba was responsible for Hadd's sentence for Hadd's crime and was therefore convicted because it was allegedly committed under section 20 of the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement) Ordinance 1979, And the score on this score was the Appellate Forum, the Federal Shariah Court as considered under section 24 of the said ordinance appeals, thus, it would be in the Federal Shariat Court and not for the High Court and therefore it was excluded. Want to be jurisdictional top advocate from Sagri lawyer