Section (c) testimony of the witnesses not only contradicted each other's material details but also contradicted the contents of the Chemical Examiner's report, but the sealed case in the landmine was presented to the court for verification. Oral evidence, such as not only was the court deprived of a valuable piece of evidence, but also the defendants were deprived of their valuable, valuable right to defend themselves in court. Who suffered the failure of justice. Do not rely on the chemical examiner's report safely in view of the above facts. This could be done because it was suspected that the material examined by him was the one that was sealed at the scene of the incident and the defense record taken by the accused was proved. Their false involvement could not be ruled out. The accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
