Find a Lawyer

PERVAIZ AHMAD KHAN versus ASHRAF BEGUM

OVI, R 17 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Article 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution, amending the written statement suit, for the accused of the declaration, during the trial, to amend his written statement. Applied for The trial court rejected, but in the review, the amendment that was sought was subject to payment of an expense of Rs. 1,500, which was approved by the plaintiffs through the constitutional petition. Editing the order's written statement was granted, which was approved by the appellate court. The amount of money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant was $ 15500 and the constitutional petition against the amendment permit was also filed after the plaintiff received the expense amount from the plaintiff, but the aforesaid No reference was made to the source. The request for recovery of costs, which was undoubtedly suppressing material facts at the part level, the defendants claimed that the collection of costs would not preclude them from the appellate court's order, allowing the amendment to the written statement. The appropriate dispute was dismissed because the plaintiff had incurred costs before filing the constitutional petition, and in doing so the plaintiff accepted and accepted the amendment, which was allowed by the appellate court, otherwise than by the conduct of the defendants. He relieved the High Court in recovering costs from the defendants on suppressing the facts of the plaintiff. Will be inclined s. list of advocates from Khanewal lawyer