Find a Lawyer

NAWAZO versus THE STATE

Sections 514 and 502 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) forfeiture of a bond of guarantee once the accused was present or his request to be made by the applicant. Was with the request of. Exclude bail privileges, the court may have taken them on their own bail so they can be offered new bonds. The provisions of section 502, subsection (3) of the CRPC were not complied with, resulting in the defendants having their escape cleared. The notice was issued to them and the hearing of the case was postponed and the apprehension that the petitioner had expressed in his petition regarding his eviction was justified. After submitting the said application, it was not the responsibility of the applicant to present the accused again in court. In such cases a decision was needed to be taken immediately, because if allowed to take time, they are bound to take advantage of it. In one instant case, the appeal for leave to appeal was made in the appeal. It was changed and it was allowed under the circumstances and under the unauthorized orders passed by the High Court and the trial court, the applicant was instructed to pay the full bail amount of Rs 6 lakh as the fines were set aside. Was done. advocate from Shemier lawyer