Find a Lawyer

MUBARIK SHAH versus RAZIA BIBI

Implementing Section 42 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Articles 122 and 123 of the gift of the suit, the plaintiff's evidence claimed that he had acquired the suit according to his shares as the legal heir of the original owner. And allegedly approving the gift by the defendant of the change was fraudulent in their favor and was bound to set aside the plaintiff for being illegal, it was further alleged that Later, the transfer of the transfer to another defendant through an alteration was also illegal, with the defendant alleging that his predecessor had delivered it. The plaintiffs were sued as the landlord of tenants who had been paying the plaintiff's share until 1994, but later refused to give the plaintiff a share of the production and the claim of the land issue and the adjudication case. I denied the claimant's ownership Revenue staff approved the gift change in their favor, the trial court dismissed the case, but the appellate court set aside Trial C's ruling and order. Our famous lower court advocate from Umer Kot lawyer