DIRECTOR, TELEGRAPH STORES AND WORKSHOP versus SAIFUDDIN
A VII, R 2 mini suit limitation delay, contempt of suit for trial and compulsory injunction by the same cause of action already filed by the apex court had taken the stand that it was appropriate in this case Procurement will not be appropriate. Although the lawsuit filed by the claimant for the money order was based on the same cause of action, he could not obtain the desired result for the improper frame and the suit for the said suit, especially when section 14 of the Limitation Act 1908 Was entitled to take advantage of it. He was not accused of not fully exploring the cause
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Swat lawyer
