Find a Lawyer

JAMIL KHAN AFRIDI versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 9 (c) Anti-Narcotics Force Act (III of 1997), Section 14 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 516 Evidence The fact that ten slabs of charase were sent to chemical analyst or not supported Done. The report which raised suspicion regarding the sample was whether it was the property that was taken as a sample at the site of the incident and such suspicion was in favor of the Deputy Director (Law) Anti. Had to resolve. The Narcotics Force, which applied before the trial court for removal of property in the 2000 kg marijuana case under Section 14 of the Anti-Drug Force Act 1997, Karachi, was not authorized to do so, otherwise, the aforesaid application was approved. Without notice or hearing of the accused, anti-narcotics force officials did not comply with the trial court's order as per letter and spirit as the samples were neither pressed nor sealed. ? The court was not started, nor was the rest of the property terminated in its presence as it could not issue the required certificates provided under Section 516A, not only the CCPC Anti-narcotics Force authorities Violated the order but disobeyed the instructions. As a result of the law contained in Section 1616 AA, CRPC, a valuable evidence was destroyed which ultimately benefited the accused and was saved from torture of the law, the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused and He was acquitted accordingly inheritance advocates near Jalozai lawyer