I.T.AS. NOS. 1884/KB OF 2002 versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1884/KB OF 2002
Sections 28, 29 and 132 (l) (a) (ii) First Appellate Authority directs the Assisting Officer without having the opportunity to hear the sale of the stock exchange card, considering the acquisition of capital, cost of acquisition and exchange transfer. Assume a major acquisition without deducting the cost of acquiring the K-card because it was neither claimed nor claimed by the assessee nor the Assigning Officer justified its appellate authority. In any of the notices issued on the instruction to correct it. Clearly illegal, because the stock exchange card price reviewer was not allowed to do so without issuing a notice, despite the fact that sections 28 and 29 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 By the way, this is in line with the directive to increase the diagnosis. Had to follow
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
