SAIF-UR-REHMAN versus MIRZA MANZOOR AHMAD
Sections 6 (2), 35 (2) and 2 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. VIII, R11, pre-discrimination in relation to residential property in the urban area of the Town Committee (2), 35 (2) ) And 2 (a) the Shariat Appeal Bench of the Supreme Court PLD 1994 SC1 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, after the implementation of 31 12, has declared it against the integration of Islam. In 1993, the following courts adopted the correct procedure for dismissing a case under OVLI, R11, CPC because the decision had the effect of pre-empting the Town Committee in relation to residential property in the urban area. Which can be implemented. According to the judgment of the Supreme Court from 31 12 1993, the plaintiff could not exercise this right in respect of the land lying in the initial phase on 4 11 1993 as the date of the sale of the property in dispute, before the right. The vacancy was not available in connection with the suit prospectus to the plaintiff y The plaintiff's town committee is located within the plant, in which case, it was rightly rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Mari Indus lawyer