Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KHALID MEHMOOD SIAL versus THE STATE


Section 319 ????? Definition of evidence This incident has occurred on a long day and there is no previous background of enmity between the parties. In this case, no question can be raised of the accused's error or falsehood. Staying on version of was confirmed by Medicare for ocular testimony. The defendant had made a specific plea, so he took the responsibility to prove that the trial court did not want to change section 2 Court30 (b), PPC to section 191919, PPC, nor the state. Did not provide a valid reason for The complainant challenged the success of the accused under section 2302 (b), the PPC convicted and the conviction of the accused were maintained

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Moro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.