KHALID MEHMOOD SIAL versus THE STATE
Section 319 ????? Definition of evidence This incident has occurred on a long day and there is no previous background of enmity between the parties. In this case, no question can be raised of the accused's error or falsehood. Staying on version of was confirmed by Medicare for ocular testimony. The defendant had made a specific plea, so he took the responsibility to prove that the trial court did not want to change section 2 Court30 (b), PPC to section 191919, PPC, nor the state. Did not provide a valid reason for The complainant challenged the success of the accused under section 2302 (b), the PPC convicted and the conviction of the accused were maintained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Moro lawyer