Sections 302, 34, 109 and 114 of the conviction, the joint intent, the instability of the evidence, the scope of the incident was an unforeseen event, and the whole case of the prosecution to prove this case on the basis of circumstantial evidence, under the circumstances. Arrived there. This must be the case so that even a knot of the chain was not missing and connected to each other, so that it could form such a continuous chain that one end of it was so attached to the other. Go The first touched the corpse, and the second tear the suspect's neck. If any link to the chain was missing, it would cause serious suspicion and the benefit was to go to the accused. In the present case, he had no nexus. ? He had an affair with the other, and he did not make the whole chain to meet the accused and the whole chain was broken and there was another, not only there, to prove the circumstances through evidence. Should be linked to each lump, but each source must be linked to open source and the source must be trusted and the truth case was filed 18 days late, and no one is named in the FIR The matter was investigated so poorly. It was proved that the evidence collected by the Investigation, and presented to the court, was not admissible on the basis that the co-accused who caused the killing by firearms was based on it. It was acquitted that the prosecution had failed to prove his case. The acquitted accused was also equated to the accused in all respects, with a delay of 9 days.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
