Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE

Section 302/377 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 The value of evidence to link the accused to the commission of the crime. One is that the children told the complainant that the accused had taken the deceased to the place of Dera / allegedly. And second, after a while, the accused was spotted by witnesses coming out of the camp, after which Beera witnesses the body of the victim, who was allegedly present with the complainant, did not support the complainant's version, In the circumstances, the complainant did not mention the names of the two children who allegedly took her with her deceased son in connection with the prosecution's story about the victim being taken away by the accused. The complainant was told about the information, was not free of doubt The trial court was not careful throughout the proceedings. The Additional Sessions Judge, who prepared the charge in the case, mentioned the deceased's wrong name and did not care to accuse him of kidnapping and of a felony. The Additional Sessions Judge, who was successful as a former Additional Sessions Judge, cared for the trial without any modification or amendment. Charges trial court also records witness's false name Chemical Examiner's report No LP prosecution case The trial court stated in its ruling that there was no evidence available to prove that any of the defendant's mitigations were terminated or terminated. There is no situation to do that and for the sake of safe administration, the accused is not being given the death penalty. The evidence of the prosecution was faulty and inadequate and the allegation against the accused did not prove beyond any reasonable doubt. advocate for immigration from Hasilpur lawyer