Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE

Section 302/377 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 The value of evidence to link the accused to the commission of the crime. One is that the children informed the complainant that the accused had allegedly taken Dera / place. And second, after a short time, witnesses were seen by the witnesses coming out of the camp, after which the body of the deceased was found in the raid which was allegedly with the complainant. The cases will be contrary to the prosecution's story. The complainant did not name the two children who allegedly told him to take his deceased son with him about the taking away of the accused by the accused. I was not free of the evidence, doubt about the information to the complainant during the proceedings cautious Additional Sessions Judge who charged the person in the case He also mentioned the wrong name of the deceased and missing and been convicted of committing the crime do not care who judge success as the additional sessions judge, act without regard for trial. The trial court also did not support the chemical examiner's prosecution of the wrongful name of the witness, the trial court said in its ruling that there was no evidence available that could prove that there was any less in the defendant's favor. There is a case to be done or annulled, and that the death sentence has not been given to the accused on the grounds that the crime is safe. The evidence of the prosecution was defective and inadequate and the accusation against the accused did not prove beyond any reasonable doubt; the allegations, in the circumstances, of taking advantage of the doubt. famous high court advocate from Samma Satta lawyer