Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMAD versus MUMTAZ KHAN

Section 10 and 11 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417, faced a lengthy appeal of the appeal against the afflicted girl, but neither her statement nor any of her statements could be dismissed. Can be falsified. During their investigation by the investigating officer, most of which was untrustworthy in the evidence, they observed that there were contradictions between the various statements made by the victims during the investigation, record such observations or The evidence was not taken from the court, based on the statements of the Investigation Officer Trial Court, which was found to have committed a serious error, the finding on the part of the Investigation Officer on the unacceptable part of the evidence was based on the material. Which was neither part of the evidence nor a decision on it. Not only was the record illegal, but it would be treated like a malicious and abusive girl who was nine years old, and all the questions posed to her were answered rationally. Confirmed by the victim's persistent statement, the victim's statement was fully supported by a medical examination conducted by the doctor. And in the material on the record, there is no doubt that the victim was kidnapped by the main accused and subjected to rape, the main accused being charged with sections 10 (3) and 11 of the adultery. The conviction was imposed and Hoodood was enforced. ) The appeal against the verdict passed by the Ordinance, 1979 trial court, was allowed to the extent of the main accused and convicted and the Victim girl herself law websites from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer