Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus FATIMA BIBI

Failure to produce any question or question regarding defendant's declaration in respect of OX, R 4 (Section 4), the OX, R 4, CPC death sentence recording, OX, R 4 (2), c. The PC Trial Court ruled against the defendants under OX, R 4 (2), CPC only because of the absence of the defendants at the specified date to record the better statement of the two parties and Nor was the e-defendant's council present to record the defendant's statement alone. History When the trial court approved and the plaintiff's case was decided in favor of the plaintiff, the court did not ask any question / question from the defendant's lawyer and no trial court could find that the defendant Ali's lawyer refused or was. Unable to answer any material question regarding the accuracy of the matter, in the absence of such a finding, the trial court could not hear the verdict because, no material question was put before the defendants' advice. Declaring the decision under OX, R 4 (2), the CPC against the default party was the fulfillment of the conditions laid down in O 4, R 4 (1); Was to be recorded accordingly. For the plaintiff because both parties were directed to appear personally but the plaintiff's statement was not recorded even though the plaintiff was present with his lawyer and the orders below the two courts were set aside. The order to shut down the right to present the defense was also set aside and after the trial was decided by the trial court, it was re-evaluated. how to become a advocate from Charsada lawyer