Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS BHATTI versus THE STATE

Section 10 (4) Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (ii) and 342 Definition of Evidence: As a married woman, the prosecutor was committed to the abuser, more helpful in her medical examination. was not. Negative husbands about semen stains were needed as a known culprit in many serious cases, which are being investigated by the police and the possibility cannot be ruled out. To make a false accusation. Pressure on the Police No one witnessed the commission of adultery under section 10 (4) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, which needed to support a very serious, unforgivable and absolutely credible evidence. Not available on the record, he was charged in the circumstances given that he could not be safely prosecuted for the irregular statement of the victim and he became worse than four. The conviction of the perpetrator of the offenses under Section 337A (ii) and M2 under Section 10 (4) of the Offense for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, was verbally supported by the PPC and documentary evidence was obtained by medical evidence. Also supported ocular testimony under Section 7 337A (ii) and 2 342, PPC, the offenders of the accused were convicted and sentenced, thereby appealing was resolved. tax advocates from Rashidabad lawyer