MESSRS CONOCO INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus UNITED BANK LIMITED, LAHORE
Sections 18 and 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Order XXI, RR 90, 92 and 94 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5, 14 and 29 (2) 28 10 1999 Implementation of the Order in Court The objection to the sale was rejected in the application filed under OCXI, R90, CPC, the sale was confirmed and the appeal filed by the appellant against such order was withdrawn, but their The constitutional petition of the High Court is pending before the High Court without any temporary restriction. The certificate appellant challenged the order to issue a sales certificate through another application, which was dismissed on 19 1 2001. The appellant filed an appeal on 1 23, 2001, in which both such orders also claim to be under Sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Prior appeals and costs for constitutional litigation were not available to record that the appellant had been deliberately prosecuting appeals and constitutional petitions. r was the affidavit of his counsel, who filed an appeal / constitutional petition, in the absence of any order of discrimination, the court properly proceeded with regard to the limitation period provided by the special law. Was different from the common law, which would be prosecuted. Such appellant was not entitled to the protection of sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
