Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASHIQ DOGAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN


Article 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was to dismiss the appeal without providing the opportunity for a hearing raised by the applicant applying the principles of natural justice, consistency, that the appellate authority appealed under Article 32. Was accepted. The Office Delegation Ombudsman Order, 1983, even without issuing notice to the applicant, affected the decision passed by the Appellate Authority by the principles of the Natural Justice High Court, so it took such a view in several constitutional petitions. So, he refused. The appellate authority was set aside to deviate from the previous point of view on the principle of consistency and the case was remanded for re-decision.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Panjgur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.