SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASHIQ DOGAR versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was to dismiss the appeal without providing the opportunity for a hearing raised by the applicant applying the principles of natural justice, consistency, that the appellate authority appealed under Article 32. Was accepted. The Office Delegation Ombudsman Order, 1983, even without issuing notice to the applicant, affected the decision passed by the Appellate Authority by the principles of the Natural Justice High Court, so it took such a view in several constitutional petitions. So, he refused. The appellate authority was set aside to deviate from the previous point of view on the principle of consistency and the case was remanded for re-decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Panjgur lawyer