Find a Lawyer

M. YASIN RASHID versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CO. LTD

Section 2 (a), 2a and 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (b) (ii) Appeals before the Service Tribunal, on the basis of an order approved by the High Court, The respondent was hired by the corporation on a work-charge basis. In the constitutional petition that was earlier filed by the appellant under which the appellant was considered a regular employee of the respondent corporation, he prayed before the service tribunal that he should pay the respondent corporation a regular pay scale. And provide all other facilities at par. Permanent employees neither have a contract of employment between the appellant and the respondent corporation nor provide the terms and conditions of service nor was there any original or appellate order rendered by the defendant corporation in which the Service Tribunals Act 1973 The provisions of Section 4 of the Code set the conditions. And in those circumstances in which the appeal should be maintained the right of appeal was a legal right and was granted to the bereaved, and the provisions of the grant of such rights also explained its scope. No external opinion or issue was imported. In the event that there is no contract of employment between the parties to which the scope of appeal before the service tribunal can be reduced, the terms and conditions of service which can be applied by the legal jurisdiction of the service tribunal Appeals were not enforceable by because the service tribunals also met the requirement of section 4 of the Act 1973 We did, Service tribunal had no power to create its jurisdiction. It has already been approved by the High Court ask a advocate free from Kohat lawyer