Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT

The plaintiff vendors claiming the specific performance of the Section 12 sale agreement claimed that defendant failed to perform his part of the contract while he was ready and willing to produce the same defendant / seller. That the plaintiffs were in the appellate court on error, after the re-examination of the evidence. It was concluded that the defendant / seller was the default and that the appellate court's finding was supported by the evidence on record, that the sale of the suit property was executed in 1986, more than 17 The Appellate Court ruled in the appeal a year ago. For more than 8 years and before the appellate court's review of the judgment, the High Court took another 8 years. The right was sold for consideration in 1986. The High Court amended the judgment and judgment and the plaintiff has already paid Rs. 12,000 as money to the appellate court, Rs. 35,000. Instead, the prosecution decided to consider Rs 50,000 and directed the claimant to pay Rs 23,000 on the sale of the balance to the defendant in the stipulated period. ask a advocate free from Phool nagar lawyer