Find a Lawyer

LT.AS. NOS.217-IB TO 220-IB, 227-IB TO 230-IB OF 2003 versus LT.AS. NOS.217-IB TO 220-IB, 227-IB TO 230-IB OF 2003

The decision in sections 132, 52/86 and 50 (4) to put the appraisal concurrently without considering all the principles of appeal, the assumption of justification had raised many grounds before the First Appellate Authority but the first appellate authority. Preferred to pass summary order without discussion. On the basis of appeal, the various facts and their legal impact on the issue was neither appreciated nor approved by such summary order as the results of the second appeal without recording any finding in the first appeal forum. Recording of the two parties will be denied a forum of appeal. Final evaluation Changes When the fact finding of each case was recorded exclusively and separately, the First Appellate Authority based on it through Assisi. No specific finding of the various issues raised was recorded, there was no appeal limit, your reply was made Appellate Tribunal had a side order of speakers on the issues of each and always directed to the TM Authority immigration advocate from Chaman lawyer