Find a Lawyer

REHMAN-UD-DIN versus SAHIBZADA JEHANZER

Section 24 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Pakistan 148 Constitution (1973), Article 1215 (3) Premature Amount (Zar e Som), was not to be submitted for extension of time taken by former Importer. Which they entrusted to him. A trial court official filed a counterfeit receipt with the amount and the officer deposited the money. The trial court dismissed the case under section 24 (2) of the North West Frontier Province Prevention Act, 1987, the appellate court allowed the appeal and issued extension time under section 148, to collect pre-emption money. The order passed by the PC (Judge Assom) Judge and the Court of Appeal was upheld by the High Court; the Appellate Court was able to extend the time for premature deposit under Section 148, CPC but such discretion. Can't be Used to defeat the purpose of the law, but such discretion can only be used in extraordinary circumstances and cases if the case is filed in advance of the umpire's ability to raise 1/3 of the time in the court-given time. The failure, which was found to be due to a court error or act and was not intentional, would be entitled to an extension of the pre-emperor's term under Sector 148, CPC but if the default in the deposit itself was a pre-empire error It would have no justification for the cause. Taking arbitration in favor of it The essential factor in judging litigation was the care and manner in which it was employed, and thus the question arises whether any The individual works diligently and is not negligent, depending on the circumstances of each case and pre-empting any defining principle. solicitors from Taunsa sharif lawyer