Find a Lawyer

SAOOD AHMAD versus TANVIR AHMAD

A. XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 and O VIII, R 10 suit for recovery of the amount on the basis of the promise clause, the undersigned of the written statement to the defendant under the closure of the defense and the delivery of the defense claim Was given. The defendants, despite numerous delays, failed to comply with the court's order and failed to file a written statement. In effect, the defendants neither complied with the conditional order nor ordered to defend the case, nor filed a decree to pay the costs. The proceedings were recalled by the court even though the written statement was not filed despite the directive in the final order. This kind of suggestion and softening by the defendant will hardly qualify him for any other error in the case, especially when the matter was summarized in which the special procedure was reviewed. Defendant's defense, in order to resolve it as quickly as possible, was properly closed to comply with the court's order and to file an injunction. In spite of the acquittal of several delays, the exercise of the jurisdiction to modify the order of the court below in the written statement cannot be interfered with by the High Court. immigration advocates from Kundina lawyer