Find a Lawyer

SYED IFTIKHAR ALI SHAH versus WAPDA

Rr 3 (c) (b) and 4 (b) (iv) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973); Termination of employment by section & and (from) Government employee was dismissed on charges of corruption / ineligibility. The public servant was served with clarity, stating that the public servant was in the habit of making controversial comments, false and unwise, complaining about his superiors, displaying behavior that employed and gentlemen. And was in the habit of deliberately stabilizing and disciplining the service, and in addition to the instructions issued by the authority, the civil servant was habitually unlawful and unlawful. Due to the reason of the case was not explained by the public servant of the clarification, nor is there any allegation of corruption nor receiving a letter, he should not be demanded a major dismissal penalty. Obviously there is some bad relationship between the public servant and his superiors. Refusing to admit the memo was no grounds for rejecting a government servant's order as per section 5 (1) of the Service Tribunals Act 1973. The dismissal case was replaced with censorship and the government employee was found to have full back benefits. Was restored to Azmat. immigration advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer