AURANGZEB versus THE STATE
The testimony of the deceased was fully involved in the case, the testimony of the deceased was fully confirmed by the deceased in Section 8 308 of his deceased statement, which was confirmed by the doctor who confirmed that the relevant It was appropriate to make a timely statement that there was no reason whatsoever to be involved in false accusations either through the evidence of the deceased or the prosecution, the ocular account through medical evidence and the deceased's declaration complete. Was supported, if both versions offered by the accused, in their statement listed under Section 3434, CRPC, S place was on the prosecution's version seems much more understandable, convincing and closer to the truth than the version that the accused was totally wrong.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Chilas lawyer
