Find a Lawyer

FARZAND RAZA NAQVI versus MUHAMMAD DIN

Civil Code of Civil Procedure (v. 1908), OIX, R6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Ex parte decree, set aside by the High Court in the Constitution of the trial court Duty Approval. In the first round of litigation, after losing a homeowner's claim in questions up to the High Court level, the jurisdictional plaintiff did not attend the same relief trial court without attending to the questions regarding the determination of the case and the claim of the defendants on the property. Demanded. The House, which was in the possession of the Defendants in the interest of its predecessor, ordered that the Defendants exercise their jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution before the High Court. The order was suspended, due to the stroke attack, the prisoner remained in bed in the forefront of interest and could not effectively raise the issue that resulted in the dismissal of Apple as well as the ruling of the previous parliament. The ex parte order could not be challenged by an appeal and his further attempt to resist the implementation of the decree Or failed, the High Court has been allowed the application, the former party order and remanded the case. In the High Court, the Court of Appeal passed the determination of eligibility without the determination of the title of the litigants and the important question whether the house was part of the defendants' house or whether it was an independent house. Would be evil. The constitutional petition rightly interfered with the issue so that no injustice was done to any party. female advocates from Cherat lawyer