Find a Lawyer

ENGINEER MUHAMMAD AHMED ABRO versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY

Section 3 (1) (c) employee was removed from the job on the charge of misconduct, the government employee, who was acting as Assistant Director (Engineering) on the direction of the Deputy Director, arrived at the scene and according to the instructions. Bridge measurements recorded. It was a dark hour of the night and although the public servant recorded the measure to a great extent, but after re-measuring, it was affected that the measurements made by the public servant were higher, causing the contractor to have more The amount was paid by a government employee who reported his error in recording the additional measure to the deputy director who decided that the contractor deducted the excess amount collected for further measurements from his other pending bills. In this situation, there was no financial loss to the public servant and no public servant was found involved. A notice of the same reason was issued to a government employee involved in corruption or corruption and the report was essentially retired from the job on the basis of the same inquiry, but upon filing an appeal, he was reinstated from the job. From this it would become a matter of discrimination because the charges against the civil servant and the co-public servant were the same but the public servant was removed from the job while the civil servant was reintroduced. In, the rule of consistency was overcome, the appeal of a public servant was accepted And officials have been instructed to reinstate the dismissed from employment on the date of the employee. registration advocate from Khushab lawyer