Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD

Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XVII, R 3 Putting aside such an order without termination of evidence without a trial Identifying the wrong date Due to the absence of the defendant's counsel, the trial court has granted the plaintiff and Reconciliation of evidence of truth witnesses was closed The defendant re-examined the witnesses on the basis that the wrong date was noted by his lawyer. The defendant relied on his lawyer's diary but did not. So the lawyer was present before the court and neither, the clerk of the trial court rejected it, but the date of review of the plea for re-examination of the witnesses. There was no relevance until the plaintiff had proven that the wrongful date had been noted, as the trial court dismissed the request for a re-examination of witnesses. had gone. The court in the circumstances advocates from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer