MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus SYED INTIZAR ABBAS ZAIDI
Request for leave to defend suit for recovery of money pursuant to A. XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 suit Application filed by defendant for a defense claim on leave subject to valid guarantees up to a specified date Providing was subjected to, but according to the order of the defendant court and the request for extension of the defendant's request for the grant of bail bonds, the trial and the trial were excluded. The plaintiff's justification for not extending the time was in view of the ambiguous grounds given. At a time when the party had been very negligent and failed to offer its default excuse, discretion could not be exercised in favor of a party where the grounds for requesting an extension of time were absolutely vague. Well, they were not enough for exercise. The applicant / defendant may not be subjected to any arbitrary weakness or illegal motion in the trial case. Error in appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Khanqah Sharif lawyer
