SAEEDUR REHMAN versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR ACQUISITION
Provisions,,, & & Land 54 Assessment of Land Acquisition Compensation with reference to the Civil Court that both the Land Acquisition Collector and the Referee Court did not consider all the relevant facts for the purpose of determining the true value of the land. ? The owners claimed that the acquired village was located close to the road and near the road that could be used. There is a record on the evidence for the purpose of construction and for those who were adding factors to the potential of the land that the land under this question is not located along or along the road as claimed by the landowners. And was also a witness in their cross examination. Acknowledged that the distance between the village and the land is two kilometers, record anything to prove that any other land in the same area was sold at a higher price. My impression of the witnesses presented by the landowners. The statements would not be enough to accept their claim for the high value of the land acquired. The question proved to be underground land \ the mother type \ which was not cultivable and no element of its probable value came out of the record. Was used to determine the value of land for the purpose of compensating by average every year, the methods recognized by law One, because the land acquisition was working correctly. The collector, rightly maintained by the referee court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
