Find a Lawyer

AWAIS versus THE STATE

Sections 4 324 / (337 / A (i) Definition of Evidence. The complainant / victim was fully supported by the prosecutor's version and his brother and his friend were fully charged with the fireworks injuries. However, the complaint was investigated for a long time, but nothing could be removed. The alleged contradictions in the complainant / victim's statement were unnecessary and damaged in this case to corroborate his testimony. The incident took place on a broad day of work and the FIR was registered without delay in the busy street of the city and the two suspects were arrested. Stating that it was designated, the facts themselves would rule out the possibility of the accused being lied to in this case, although it is said that the incident has been viewed in large numbers and there is no independent and undisclosed area. The testimony was not presented - to lend to support the trial case, but in view of the prevailing social conditions in society, refrain from throwing strangers into other people's affairs. The absence of a vacancy was fatal in the prosecution's case as the investigating officer returned the spot after fourteen days' presence. Otherwise, the possibility of blood and emptiness or destruction, could not be excluded was not in ocular detection of the incident, contradicting the medical evidence that the complainant was not on good terms with her husband, it was likely The husband was involved in the case, he was suspended because there was nothing to file. The slightest indication of this impression was that a strong motive was set in the FIR, to which n when you need a advocate from Chaman lawyer