Find a Lawyer

LT.-GEN. (RETD.) SHAH RAFI ALAM versus LAHORE RACE CLUB

Section 160A [as amended by Companies (Amendment) Ordinance (C of 2002]]), canceling the 161, 178 and 179 Annual General Meeting Proceedings of the Board of Directors (Race Club) Annual General According to the minutes of the meeting, twenty-two members, including four applicants, presented themselves for the scholarship / director of the Club Tan members and another was chosen, while others were ignored or rejected. There is no justification under the Company's ordinance, in or or in or the Articles of Association. Candidates' proposals and their endorsements have been considered under any Ordinance Section 178 (3), which approved the Ordinance to withdraw the nomination by the members, who presented themselves as candidates. Yes, the names of such members were kept on record in case of withdrawal, they will remain so as candidates. The annual general meeting of the clubhouse was irregular in offering personal reasons to the members. In the presence of special supplies for the announcement of the election, the directors could not be resorted to to invalidate, the general provisions for adjournment of the annual general meeting proceedings, to halt the proceedings of the general meeting, alleging violation of personal rights. Was imposed, the voting power required to petition the court was 10%, while in order to revoke the selection of directors, under section 179 of the ordinance it could be requested to have less than 20% of the voting power. Members of the company did not have 20% of the voting power in the company, therefore, they could not be allowed to receive Which is a direct online advocate from Shorkot lawyer