KAMARUDDIN VALIKA versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O VII, R 11 (a) The reason for the dismissal of the defendant was exclusive of the suit established by the suit), a writ for specific performance but also an alternative claim for compensation / damages. The plaintiff compiled the necessary details in relation to the correspondence between her and some of the defendants, in which the initial fax contained some agreement between them regarding the transfer of some land in favor of the plaintiff on payment in the case of sale. / The contract existed. As mentioned in the documents, the defendants in the documents associated with the plaintiff have tried to reject the sparrow on the basis that the plaintiff has not shown any cause of action against them, so much so that it is not in the initial stage. It can be said that there is no reason to file a claim. Even if the plaintiff fails to prove his case for specific performance of the contract against the defendants, a decree for compensation / damages against him was rejected by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Parachinar lawyer