SHAMSHAD AHMAD versus THE STATE
Sections 398/149, 353/149, 324/149, 148 and 393 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), sections 7 (b) and 7 (h) were apprehended by the accused on the night of the incident. Went and did not challenge the timing of the incident in his statement, although the accused allegedly fired twice at the police party with the repeater gun, but even then neither the police party nor the police car was shot. ? The scenario of the prosecution's rejection of the theory that the police were shooting at the defendants in self-defense, thus the two sides had suppressed the fact and the court would draw the evidence itself after stopping the evidence. I was not a police encounter. The place and the story about it were later prepared on the accused according to all the charges on which he was sentenced, but now he was sentenced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Charsada lawyer