Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI ISMAILIA versus KHALID MEHMOOD

Sections 151 and 152 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 150 and 185 (3) Judicial proceedings, preventing the litigation from any statement recorded by the civil judge during the proceedings, the petitioner's complaint was that The statements made by the civilian were not made by him on behalf of the judge during the proceedings. If there is a wrong reading in the civil judge's order, the applicant should, or should, be dismissed or broken by applying to the civil judge under Sections 151 and 152 CPC. Challenging the order containing the incorrect reading of his statements, he has approached the next higher forum, but the applicant did not challenge the same Supreme Court under Article 150, giving full confidence and credibility of the constitution to the judiciary. Court proceedings / orders cannot be invalidated based solely on the applicant's oral denial. Not only the previous state in the previous case, but also the applicant's statement was read, the last case in the court order of the civil judge was that of the inter-party, which, along with other reliable documentary evidence, was used by the defendant's decisions and orders. Was completed and corroborated by oral testimony. The High Court and the trial court were based on the definition of evidence and the proper application of the law, which was based on concrete and concrete reasons for reaching a correct conclusion, which did not guarantee the intervention of the Supreme Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. Was. immigration advocate from Hazro lawyer