Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI KHAN versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Article 199 Constitution Petition dismisses civil service, after dismissal of public servants, a constitutional petition has been filed against the dismissal order, the High Court remanded the authority for this decision after hearing the petitioner. Diya, a notice was taken following the aforesaid order of the High Court. Applicant through the Authority and stated that the notice applicant has been dismissed. (EN PITITER filed a constitutional petition that allowed that the notice of the applicant acting as a former employee was declared illegal. As per the High Court order, it It was ordered by the High Court that in the future when the notice of hearing will be issued to the applicant, it will be stated as suspended XEN and not as a former employee till the final order is passed by the authority. Applicant hearing the applicant could not request that he be reinstated at any time at the time of his dismissal. The order of use was never fixed. In the constitutional petition filed by the applicant, his complaint was that he should not be described as a former employee while issuing a notice to him by the authority, the High Court directed. Provided that he should be described as an employee under suspension which does not mean that the applicant was reinstated or in fact suspended. us immigration advocates from Ghizer lawyer