Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus MS. SHAISTA NAHEED

Sections III, C1 75 (h), (AH) and (AJ) Service Removal (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Sections 3, 5 and 8 [Extracting from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (V 2001). Amendment of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3), appropriate inquiry, departmental inquiry made against non-participation of employees under the Pakistan International Airline Employees (Service and Discipline) Rules, 1985 I apologize. Service (Special Powers) Section of the Ordinance 2000, and the employee was dismissed from service The service tribunal allowed the employee to file an appeal and reinstate it with back benefits through the Pakistan International Airlines Corporation. went. Exclusion from the Service (Special Powers) He was rightfully dismissed for not having another inquiry under the provisions of the Ordinance 2000. After the first inquiry, the second inquiry was initiated under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, such action was unreasonable and it shows that the employer was urged to remove the employee in any case. Was charged with adultery, under section 5. The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, removal from 2000, was to have a full inquiry, which was not made in this case, if in the case of penalties, a proper inquiry should be made according to the law which had a full opportunity. Was. The defense was to be provided by the service tribunal for valid and proper reasons, and it was in accordance with the law of the Supreme Court and there was no misrepresentation of material evidence or reading of the facts and rules. top advocates from FR Kohat lawyer