KHURRAM MASIH versus THE STATE
The grant of the names of the accused was not liable for the failure to mention the delay in filing the case, Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 436/34, several weeks in the prosecution's case. The delay in investigating the prosecution's witnesses was not fatal. However, in favor of the accused, the accused remained in custody for about ten months and the accused's guilt was not sought for further investigation; under section 497 (2) for further investigation, the CCP confessed to the accused. has been. Bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Chaman lawyer
