Find a Lawyer

DR. ASIF ALI KHOKHAR versus CHIEF SECRETARY

RA (1) (a) (ii) In the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), section 4 was ordered to stop the inquiry against a civil servant serving as a medico legal officer when he was charged Had issued a showcase notice stating that the Medico Legal Certificate was issued after them. The Medical Board had termed the treatment of the injured party wrong, the Medical Board, based on the opposition's offer, had allegedly given remarks that the injured had suffered from injury, but a civil servant had deliberately rescinded the medico legal The fact was not mentioned in the certificate medical board. Formed 1 day after the issuance of a medical certificate by a public servant and a public servant who was not asked to explain his point of view / attendance at the meeting of the Medical Board, the official said in the certificate. That the fracture was on the little finger of the right hand. There was no mention of the injured Medical Board in its remarks that there was no fracture, as stated by the Government Employees Board. The history of the trial shows that the injured have to bear the burden of self-incrimination. The Medco Legal Officer had no business to determine that he was in the nature of an injury and that this was to be decided by the relevant court. Whether or not someone was hurt and to reach out. As a result, the court had to examine the relevant doctor. No abusive activity was found by the public servant and there was no report if the public servant intentionally mentioned this in the medical certificate. Left the injury to the injured person himself tax advocates from Mardan lawyer