The suit property that was set out in nature for a special suit of section 12 suit was allotted to women as displaced persons, but its lawyer was fraudulently allotted in his own name. The plaintiff hats allegedly obtained it through an unregistered sale. The plaintiff obtained an injunction for the specific performance of the sale agreement that the defendants claimed they had purchased the suit property from the last buyer when the allotment was in favor of the female allottee, which allegedly the female allottee. The allotment was made in favor of K's lawyer, who later sold the same. The plaintiff, under the authority of the Complaint Authority, was terminated when it was found that the attorney had received the allotment through fraud, and the woman's attorney, who did not own the suit property of the seller, was granted in favor of the plaintiff, invalid. The decree and such decree, which was void and void, will also be disregarded by the plaintiff / vendor of the executing court, as the order cannot be taken asylum because it stepped into the shoes of the seller who had The suit property had no legal title, the appellate court's view was in accordance with the law of law and justice and it was solid and credible. Was based on the evidence. The cases prepared by the appellate court were fair and the results recorded on them were in accordance with the evidence on record. There is no exception to the finding of an appellate court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
