Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus NOOR JAMAL

RR 2 (4), 3 (b) and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Rehabilitation Failure to carry out significant inquiry Failure to make proper inquiry A government employee was dismissed on charges of corruption. , In fact, two investigations are under way. The department had made allegations against the civil servant and on the basis of such inquiry report, the major penalty for dismissal of the job was awarded to the public servant. On the contrary, it was waived in an inquiry by the Federal Investigation Agency because there was no material available against them. The Service Tribunal allowed the appeal and the civil servants were hired. In the case of major penalties, the proper investigation was 4o to comply with R6 of Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules 1973. In which an infamous officer was to be given the opportunity of defense and personal hearing after issuing and responding to the showcase nozzo and if the allegation was proved in a regular investigation, he would be sentenced by the service tribunal. Was based on valid reasons and was in accordance with the law of the Supreme Court and neither the material evidence was misrepresented nor the reading of the notice, nor was the fact of the service tribunal or the wrong structure of the law involved. , The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. when you need a advocate from Punch lawyer