Find a Lawyer

MIAN TAYYIB-UD-DIN versus MUHAMMAD ATIQ

Section 8 occupation of immovable property, in the interest of the defendants, was the restoration of the occupation profession to the Imam Mosque and the suit land was granted to him when the chair entrant began construction on the suit land when the plaintiffs and through the recovery The lawsuit was filed. The trial court dismissed the trial related to the trial, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and, hearing the trial, the appellate court granted review and jurisdiction to the High Court and restored the judgment passed by the trial court. Done. As a gift or gift in the interest of his predecessor, when the defendant further claimed that he was also the owner through adverse possession, the suit of the plaintiff and his predecessor, in the interest of the entrant, surrounded the suit. Were on land, they could not claim it. Their occupation was negative, because in the interest of the defendants, the predecessor function was performed when the claim was filed and his father was before the imam mosque. While performing the duties of the Imam Mosque in advance, his gift will continue to work even if the defendants remain. The house could not be claimed to be legally negative as a non-resident for any length of time, the High Court overlooked the position altogether because it was born from long admissions in the revenue record and the law Had committed a mistake. It was a case of self-proclaimed gift land and such evidence was based on a serious misinterpretation of the evidence, so the decision could not be sustained. The High Court requested the defendants' review. jobs for advocates from Village Sunder lawyer