Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus MS. SHAISTA NAHEED

Removal of Sections III, C1 75 (h), (AH) and (AJ) Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Sections 3, 5 and 8 [as amended by the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (V of V 2001). Removed from the Amendment))] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Removal of Services Proper Inquiry, Non-Participation of Employees Against The Pakistan International Airline Corporation Employees (Service and Discipline) Rules, 1985 Apologies were sought in the under-court inquiry. Service (Special Powers) Section of the Ordinance 2000, and the employee was dismissed from service The service tribunal allowed the employee to file an appeal and reinstate it with back benefits through the Pakistan International Airlines Corporation. went. Exclusion from the Service (Special Powers) He was rightfully dismissed for not having another inquiry under the provisions of the Ordinance 2000. After the first inquiry, the second inquiry was initiated under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, such action was unreasonable and it shows that the employer was urged to remove the employee in any case. Was charged with adultery, under section 5. The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, to be removed from 2000, was to have a full inquiry, which was not done in this case. In the case of major fines, a proper inquiry should be made in accordance with the law which was to provide full defense opportunity. The decision was heard by the Service Tribunal and was based on reasonable, reasons, and it was in accordance with the law established by the Supreme Court, nor was there any misrepresentation of material evidence or reading, nor false interpretation of facts and law. best law firms from Mari Indus lawyer