FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION versus NOOR JAMAL, EX-EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RR 2 (4), 3 (b) and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Rehabilitation Failure to carry out significant inquiry Failure to make proper inquiry A government employee was dismissed on charges of corruption. , In fact, two investigations are under way. Charges were leveled against the government employee by the department and, on the basis of such inquiry reports, the major penalty for dismissal of the job was declared to be a public servant, on the contrary, in the inquiry by the Federal Investigation Agency Was waived because there was no content available against it. Its service tribunal allowed the appeal and government employees were reinstated. In the case of major fines, a proper inquiry should be made in accordance with R6 of 1973 of the Public Employees (Utilities and Discipline) Rules, in which a corrupt officer shall issue a defense notice after issuing a show cause notice and The opportunity for a personal hearing was to be provided, and if the evidence in the routine investigation of the Chief Justice was proved, he would be punished for the right reasons given by the service tribunal and according to the law of the Supreme Court. In which there was no misrepresentation or material evidence, and no misunderstanding was created. Service tribunal's decision involved facts or law, appeal dismissed by Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
