MUHAMMAD JAMEEL versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) / 392/411/452/34 was defined as evidence by the prosecution witnesses who allegedly made additional judicial confessions, which was unnatural, as after the alleged confession of the accused. The prosecution witnesses neither arrested the accused nor complained to the police, and the police recorded the statements of the prosecutor's witnesses in four cases. Such facts were sufficient to prove that they said that the prosecution's witnesses were made witnesses, that the last two aspects were presented by two witnesses and one of them was dropped during the conduct. And the other witness's method was sufficient to present the final testimony. Discard his statement No weapon was recovered from the suspect's knife, which was recovered at the identification of the co-accused, sentenced to life imprisonment and he did not appeal his conviction and sentence. A recovery witness was a resident of the other suspect, although he did not provide any defense evidence, but the prosecutor had to stand on his feet and not take advantage. Defendant's supplemental statement was made by the complainant in the facts and circumstances of the case, had no significant value and in the case where there was no conclusive evidence in which the accused was charged with the commission of the crime against him Was not connected to the defendant's record, especially when there was a link in the chain of suspicion in the trial case, the trial court found that the accused had been convicted and sentenced. I gave him the benefit of the doubt and the accused was acquitted and released soon
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Manga Mandi lawyer